Lemberg Solutions vs Innowise: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Innowise (3.8/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for full-stack embedded builds needing hardware through cloud in one team. Innowise is the stronger option for buyers wanting embedded work bundled with broader software outsourcing. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Innowise: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Innowise |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2007 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 200+ | 1,001–5,000 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | 360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab | Large-scale IT outsourcing capacity with an IoT/embedded delivery line inside a much broader software portfolio |
| Pricing model | Technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development | Fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Embedded Linux (Yocto) | Embedded Linux, C/C++, AWS IoT |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech | Healthcare, Fintech, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Retail |
Lemberg Solutions vs Innowise: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions is an embedded and full-stack engineering firm founded in 2007 and headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany, London, United Kingdom, and Kraków, Poland. The 200+ person team covers electrical engineering, bare-metal and RTOS firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA programming, embedded GUI development, connectivity and IoT, edge AI, and cybersecurity, and positions itself around "360° engineering expertise" spanning Embedded, Cloud, Data & AI, and Digital domains rather than embedded work in isolation. The company holds ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications and works with semiconductor partners including NXP, Microchip, and STMicroelectronics as primary partners, alongside Texas Instruments, Nordic Semiconductor, Renesas, and others. Named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, and Bosch Rexroth, and all intellectual property and source code rights transfer to the client on delivery.
Innowise
Innowise was founded in 2007 and is headquartered in Warsaw, Poland, having grown into a multinational IT outsourcing business with delivery centers across Europe and a workforce reported between roughly 2,000 and 3,500+ professionals depending on the source. The company's core business is broad custom software development, software product development, and staff augmentation across many technology domains; embedded and IoT engineering is one practice area within that broader portfolio rather than the firm's primary specialization, which distinguishes it from boutique embedded-only shops on this list.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Innowise
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Innowise |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✗ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✓ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Innowise
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Innowise |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | ✓ | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Verilog | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Innowise
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Innowise |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Technical consulting, Team extension, End-to-end product development | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Innowise
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Innowise |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics | Healthcare, Fintech, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT |
| Best use cases | EV charging stations needing OCPP-compliant control software, Medical device firmware requiring FDA/IEC 62304-aware development and porting | IoT products needing embedded firmware plus a full cloud/mobile companion app from one vendor, Staff augmentation for teams needing to scale an existing embedded project quickly |
| Typical project type | Technical consulting | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs Innowise: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | 360° coverage from electrical engineering and PCB design through firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, and cloud/edge AI under one roof |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications support regulated-industry work in medical, energy, and automotive |
| + | Named semiconductor partnerships with NXP, Microchip, and STMicroelectronics plus a documented in-house hardware lab for board bring-up |
| + | Full intellectual property and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| + | Named public case studies spanning EV charging (OCPP), 3D bioprinting, and medical device firmware ported to STM32 |
| - | Does not handle mass production in-house — supports development and ongoing maintenance but does not manufacture finished devices |
| - | Does not obtain product regulatory certification on the client's behalf — provides technical documentation and engineering support, but the client or a third party owns the certification process |
| - | Pricing is not published; engagement scope and cost require a direct discovery call |
| Innowise | |
|---|---|
| + | Large delivery capacity (1,000+ engineers) can absorb bigger multi-workstream programs than boutique embedded shops |
| + | European (Poland) legal HQ appeals to buyers wanting EU-based contracting |
| + | Broader software portfolio (cloud, mobile, web) available alongside embedded work for full-stack IoT products |
| - | Embedded/IoT is one of many practice areas rather than a core specialization — depth is shallower than firms built around embedded from day one |
| - | Reported team size varies significantly by source (2,000 to 3,500+), making exact embedded-team capacity hard to verify |
| - | No named public embedded case studies with specific outcomes |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: EV charging stations needing OCPP-compliant control software.
360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech.
Who should choose Innowise?
A typical fit: IoT products needing embedded firmware plus a full cloud/mobile companion app from one vendor.
Large-scale IT outsourcing capacity with an IoT/embedded delivery line inside a much broader software portfolio. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Fintech, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Retail.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Innowise
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Innowise |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Innowise |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Innowise (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Innowise
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Innowise fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EV charging stations needing OCPP-compliant control software | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Medical device firmware requiring FDA/IEC 62304-aware development and porting | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| IoT products needing embedded firmware plus a full cloud/mobile companion app from one vendor | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation for teams needing to scale an existing embedded project quickly | Limited | Strong | Innowise |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Strong | Innowise |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Innowise
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software projects. 360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab.
Innowise (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need staff augmentation for teams needing to scale an existing embedded project quickly. If your situation matches that, Innowise is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Innowise FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Innowise?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: 360° coverage from electrical engineering and PCB design through firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, and cloud/edge AI under one roof. Innowise's strongest advantage: large delivery capacity (1,000+ engineers) can absorb bigger multi-workstream programs than boutique embedded shops.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Innowise differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Innowise uses fixed project, dedicated team, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Innowise?
Innowise is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Innowise?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: 360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab. Innowise's primary differentiator is: large-scale IT outsourcing capacity with an IoT/embedded delivery line inside a much broader software portfolio. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 1,001–5,000), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers) vs Healthcare, Fintech).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.