Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Timesys (4.2/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for full-stack embedded builds needing hardware through cloud in one team. Timesys is the stronger option for teams needing embedded Linux security and long-term maintenance expertise. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1996 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | 51–200 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | 360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab | Nearly three-decade specialization in embedded Linux security and long-term-support tooling, now under Lynx Software Technologies |
| Pricing model | Technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development | Engineering services, tooling licenses |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Embedded Linux (Yocto) | Embedded Linux (Yocto), C/C++, Linux kernel security patching |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech | Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking, Consumer Electronics |
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions is an embedded and full-stack engineering firm founded in 2007 and headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, Germany, London, United Kingdom, and Kraków, Poland. The 200+ person team covers electrical engineering, bare-metal and RTOS firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA programming, embedded GUI development, connectivity and IoT, edge AI, and cybersecurity, and positions itself around "360° engineering expertise" spanning Embedded, Cloud, Data & AI, and Digital domains rather than embedded work in isolation. The company holds ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications and works with semiconductor partners including NXP, Microchip, and STMicroelectronics as primary partners, alongside Texas Instruments, Nordic Semiconductor, Renesas, and others. Named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink, and Bosch Rexroth, and all intellectual property and source code rights transfer to the client on delivery.
Timesys
Timesys Corporation was founded in 1996 by principals associated with Carnegie Mellon University and built one of the first real-time-enhanced embedded Linux distributions. Headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania with roughly 60 employees, Timesys built a long-running specialty in embedded Linux security, engineering services, and long-term maintenance tooling. In December 2023 the company was acquired by Lynx Software Technologies, and buyers evaluating Timesys today should confirm current organizational structure and service continuity directly, since acquisitions of this kind typically bring some integration transition period.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| RTOS firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux (Yocto/BuildRoot) | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA programming (Verilog/VHDL) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Hardware & PCB / electrical engineering | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity & protocols | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI / on-device ML | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded GUI development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cybersecurity & secure boot | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation / team extension | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | ✓ | N/A |
| CAN bus | N/A | N/A |
| Qt | ✓ | N/A |
| Verilog | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Technical consulting, Team extension, End-to-end product development | Engineering services, Tooling/licensing |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Timesys |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics | Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking |
| Best use cases | EV charging stations needing OCPP-compliant control software, Medical device firmware requiring FDA/IEC 62304-aware development and porting | Products requiring long-term embedded Linux security patching and CVE monitoring, Real-time Linux systems needing specialist kernel-level engineering |
| Typical project type | Technical consulting | Engineering services |
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | 360° coverage from electrical engineering and PCB design through firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, and cloud/edge AI under one roof |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications support regulated-industry work in medical, energy, and automotive |
| + | Named semiconductor partnerships with NXP, Microchip, and STMicroelectronics plus a documented in-house hardware lab for board bring-up |
| + | Full intellectual property and source code rights transfer to the client on every engagement |
| + | Named public case studies spanning EV charging (OCPP), 3D bioprinting, and medical device firmware ported to STM32 |
| - | Does not handle mass production in-house — supports development and ongoing maintenance but does not manufacture finished devices |
| - | Does not obtain product regulatory certification on the client's behalf — provides technical documentation and engineering support, but the client or a third party owns the certification process |
| - | Pricing is not published; engagement scope and cost require a direct discovery call |
| Timesys | |
|---|---|
| + | Nearly 30 years of embedded Linux specialization, among the longest track records on this list |
| + | Named expertise in embedded Linux security patching and long-term maintenance, an underserved niche most generalists don't cover deeply |
| + | Founding team's Carnegie Mellon research background underpins its real-time Linux heritage |
| - | Acquired by Lynx Software Technologies in December 2023 — buyers should confirm current service continuity and organizational structure directly, since post-acquisition integration periods can affect delivery |
| - | Team size (~60) limits capacity for very large concurrent programs |
| - | Public pricing and minimum engagement are not disclosed |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: EV charging stations needing OCPP-compliant control software.
360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing/Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive, Agritech.
Who should choose Timesys?
A typical fit: products requiring long-term embedded Linux security patching and CVE monitoring.
Nearly three-decade specialization in embedded Linux security and long-term-support tooling, now under Lynx Software Technologies. Minimum engagement starts at Not disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Medical devices, Networking, Consumer Electronics.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Timesys (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Timesys fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EV charging stations needing OCPP-compliant control software | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Medical device firmware requiring FDA/IEC 62304-aware development and porting | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Products requiring long-term embedded Linux security patching and CVE monitoring | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Real-time Linux systems needing specialist kernel-level engineering | Limited | Strong | Timesys |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Software projects. 360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab.
Timesys (4.2/5) is worth a look if you need real-time Linux systems needing specialist kernel-level engineering. If your situation matches that, Timesys is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Timesys FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Timesys?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: 360° coverage from electrical engineering and PCB design through firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA, and cloud/edge AI under one roof. Timesys's strongest advantage: nearly 30 years of embedded Linux specialization, among the longest track records on this list.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Timesys differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses technical consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, and end-to-end product development pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Timesys uses engineering services, tooling licenses pricing with a minimum engagement of Not disclosed. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Timesys?
Timesys is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Timesys?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: 360° engineering across electrical, firmware, Linux, FPGA, and cloud under one roof with a certified in-house hardware lab. Timesys's primary differentiator is: nearly three-decade specialization in embedded Linux security and long-term-support tooling, now under Lynx Software Technologies. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA/HIPAA), Energy (battery/EV chargers) vs Industrial IoT, Medical devices).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.